Sunday December 7, 2014
PETALING JAYA: Deeply concerned
over developments regarding race relations, Islam and extremist behaviour in
Malaysia, a group of 25 prominent Malays have called for a rational dialogue on
the position of Islam in a constitutional democracy.
"Given the impact of such
vitriolic rhetoric on race relations and political stability of this country,
we feel it is incumbent on us to take a public position," said Datuk Noor
Farida Ariffin, former Malaysian Ambassador to the Netherlands, in a statement
on Sunday issued on behalf of the 25 signatories.
The statement (attached below)
was signed by prominent personalities, including former secretaries-general,
directors-general, ambassadors and prominent Malay individuals who have
contributed much to Malaysian society.
Noor Farida, also former
director-general of the Foreign Ministry's Research, Treaties and International
Law Department, said she and the others "are deeply concerned about the
state of the debate on many issues of conflict on the position and application
of Islamic laws in Malaysia".
"It is high time moderate
Malays and Muslims speak out. Extremist, immoderate and intolerant voices as
represented by Perkasa and Isma do not speak in our name.
"Given the impact of such
vitriolic rhetoric on race relations and political stability of this country,
we feel it is incumbent on us to take a public position and urge for an
informed and rational dialogue on the ways Islam is used as a source of public
law and policy in Malaysia.
"Most importantly, we call
on the Prime Minister to exercise his leadership and political will to
establish an inclusive consultative committee to find solutions to these
intractable problems that have been allowed to fester for too long.
"We also urge more moderate
Malaysians to speak up and contribute to a better informed and rational public
discussion on the place of Islamic laws within a constitutional democracy and
the urgency to address the breakdown of federal-state division of powers and
finding solutions to the heart-wrenching stories of lives and relationships
damaged and put in limbo because of battles over turf and identity," she
said.
Letter to the people of Malaysia: Champion open debate and discourse on
Islamic law
We, a group of concerned citizens
of Malaysia, would like to express how disturbed and deeply dismayed we are
over the continuing unresolved disputes on the position and application of
Islamic laws in this country. The on-going debate over these matters display a
lack of clarity and understanding on the place of Islam within our
Constitutional democracy. Moreover, they reflect a serious breakdown of
federal-state division of powers, both in the areas of civil and criminal
jurisdictions.
We refer specifically to the
current situation where religious bodies seem to be asserting authority beyond
their jurisdiction; where issuance of various fatwa violate the Federal
Constitution and breach the democratic and consultative process of shura; where
the rise of supremacist NGOs accusing dissenting voices of being anti-Islam,
anti-monarchy and anti-Malay has made attempts at rational discussion and
conflict resolution difficult; and most importantly, where the use of the
Sedition Act hangs as a constant threat to silence anyone with a contrary
opinion.
These developments undermine
Malaysia's commitment to democratic principles and rule of law, breed
intolerance and bigotry, and have heightened anxieties over national peace and
stability.
As moderate Muslims, we are
particularly concerned with the statement issued by Minister Datuk Seri Jamil
Khir Baharom, in response to the recent Court of Appeal judgement on the right
of transgendered women to dress according to their identity. He viewed the
right of the transgender community and Sisters in Islam (SIS) to seek legal
redress as a "new wave of assault on Islam" and as an attempt to lead
Muslims astray from their faith, and put religious institutions on trial in a
secular court.
Such an inflammatory statement
from a Federal Minister (and not for the first time) sends a public message
that the Prime Minister's commitment to the path of moderation need not be
taken seriously when a Cabinet minister can persistently undermine it.
These issues of concern we raise
are of course difficult matters to address given the extreme politicisation of
race and religion in this country. But we believe there is a real need for a
consultative process that will bring together experts in various fields,
including Islamic and Constitutional laws, and those affected by the
application of Islamic laws in adverse ways.
We also believe the Prime
Minister is best placed with the resources and authority to lead this
consultative process. It is urgent that all Malaysians are invested in finding
solutions to these long-standing areas of conflict that have led to the
deterioration of race relations, eroded citizens' sense of safety and
protection under the rule of law, and undermined stability.
There are many pressing issues
affecting all of us that need the urgent leadership and vision of the Prime
Minister, the support of his Cabinet and all moderate Malaysians. They include:
1) A plural legal system that has
led to many areas of conflict and overlap between civil and syariah laws. In
particular there is an urgent need to review the Syariah Criminal Offences
(SCO) laws of Malaysia.
These laws, which turn all manner
of "sins" into crimes against the state have led to confusion and
dispute in both substance and implementation. They are in conflict with Islamic
legal principles and constitute a violation of fundamental liberties and state
intrusion into the private lives of citizens.
In 1999, the Cabinet directed the
Attorney-General's Chambers to review the SCO laws. But to this day, they
continue to be enforced with more injustices perpetrated. The public outrage,
debates over issues of jurisdiction, judicial challenge, accusations of abuses
committed, gender discrimination, and deaths and injuries caused in moral
policing raids have eroded the credibility of the SCO laws, the law-making
process, and public confidence that Islamic law could indeed bring about
justice.
2) The lack of public awareness,
even among top political leaders, on the legal jurisdiction and substantive
limits of the powers of the religious authorities and administration of Islamic
laws in Malaysia.
The Federal Constitution is the
supreme law of the land and any law enacted, including Islamic laws, cannot
violate the Constitution, in particular the provisions on fundamental
liberties, federal-state division of powers and legislative procedures.
All Acts, Enactments and
subsidiary legislation, including fatwa, are bound by constitutional limits and
are open to judicial review.
3) The need to ensure the right
of citizens to debate the ways Islam is used as a source of public law and
policy in this country. The Islamic laws of Malaysia are drafted by the
executive arm of government and enacted in the legislative bodies by human
beings. Their source may be divine, but the enacted laws are not divine. They
are human-made and therefore fallible, open to debate and challenge to ensure
that justice is upheld.
4) The need to promote awareness
of the rich diversity of interpretive texts and juristic opinions in the
Islamic tradition. This includes conceptual legal tools that exist in the
tradition that enable reform to take place and the principles of equality and
justice to be upheld, in particular in response to the changing demands, role
and status of women in the family and community.
5) The need for the Prime
Minister to assert his personal leadership as well as appoint key leaders who
will, in all fairness, champion open and coherent debate and discourse on the
administration of Islamic laws in this country to ensure that justice is done.
We especially urge that the leadership sends a clear signal that rational and
informed debate on Islamic laws in Malaysia and how they are codified and
implemented are not regarded as an insult to Islam or to the religious
authorities.
These issues may seem complex to
many, but at the end of the day, it really boils down to this - as Muslims, we
want Islamic law, even more than civil law, to meet the highest standards of
justice precisely because it claims to reflect divine justice. Therefore, those
who act in the name of Islam through the administration of Islamic law must
bear the responsibility of demonstrating that justice is done and is seen to be
done.
When Islam was revealed to our
Prophet (SAW) in 7th century Arabia, it was astoundingly revolutionary and
progressive. Over the centuries, the religion has guided believers through
harsh and challenging times. It is our fervent belief that for Islam to
continue to be relevant and universal in our times, the understanding,
codification and implementation of the teachings of our faith must continue to
evolve. Only with this, can justice, as enjoined by Allah SWT, prevail.
Sincerely,
1.
Tan Sri Datuk Abdul Rahim Haji Din, former Secretary-General, Home Affairs
Ministry
2.
Tan Sri Ahmad Kamil Jaafar, former Secretary-General, Foreign Affairs Ministry
3.
Tan Sri Dr Aris Othman, former Secretary-General, Finance Ministry
4.
Tan Sri Dr Ismail Merican; former Director-General, Health Ministry
5.
Tan Sri Mohd Sheriff Mohd Kassim, former Secretary-General, Finance Ministry
6.
Tan Sri Dr Mustaffa Babjee, former Director-General, Veterinary Services
Department
7.
Tan Sri Nuraizah Abdul Hamid, former Secretary-General, Energy, Communications
and Multimedia Ministry
8.
Tan Sri Dr Yahya Awang, cardiothoracic surgeon and core founder, National Heart
Institute
9.
Datuk Seri Shaik Daud Md Ismail, former Court of Appeal Judge
10.
Datuk' Abdul Kadir Mohd Deen, former Ambassador
11.
Datuk Anwar Fazal, former senior regional advisor, United Nations Development
Programme
12.
Datuk Dali Mahmud Hashim, former ambassador
13.
Datuk Emam Mohd Haniff Mohd Hussein, former ambassador
14.
Datuk Faridah Khalid, representative of Women's Voice
15.
Datuk Latifah Merican Cheong, former Assistant Governor, Bank Negara
16.
Lt Gen (Rtd) Datuk Maulob Maamin, Lieutenant General (Rtd)
17.
Datuk Noor Farida Ariffin, former ambassador
18.
Datuk Ranita Hussein, former Suhakam Commissioner
19.
Datuk Redzuan Kushairi, former ambassador
20.
Datuk Dr Sharom Ahmat, former Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Universiti Sains Malaysia
21.
Datuk Syed Arif Fadhillah, former ambassador
22.
Datuk Zainal Abidin Ahmad, former Director-General, Malaysian Timber Industry
Board
23.
Datuk Zainuddin Bahari, former Deputy Secretary-General, Domestic Trade,
Co-operatives and Consumerism Ministry
24.
Datin Halimah Mohd Said, former lecturer, Universiti Malaya and President,
Association of Voices of Peace, Conscience and Reason (PCORE)
25.
Puan Hendon Mohamad, Past President, Malaysian Bar
